It's been an interesting weekfor me. I've been at the receiving end of a cyber-bollocking. I've not been sure how to react which is why it took me some time to write about it. I'm still not entirely sure about all this - but it's time to post. Maybe the process of writing will help to enlighten me further.
An e-mail group I belong to has been vigorously debating the post-modern idea that the personal is political and the political is personal.
You see, some issues came up on the group that have dealt with language around disability. I have been very vocal on language issues and have very strong feelings about this. I don't like it when my children get reduced to their disability. I encounter people on daily basis who refer to my kids as "the CP boy" or "the little CP girl" and to us as "the CP family". The same battle is fought by other families who try to eradicate terms such as "the Downs girl or "the autistic boy" because they reduce a person to their disability. I mean, come on, you wouldn't find it polite to refer to your colleague as "the breast cancer woman" your sister as "the bipolar girl" or your grandfather as "the Alzheimer guy". Make the analogy with race, and see if it sounds discriminatory…
I constantly have to tell people that my kids are kids, and we are a family foremost, and yes, we happen to deal with CP, but that is not who my kids are or what our family is about. Of course these tings are very real, but we can choose our words carefully.
Language is important. I think it's a vital tool in acceptance and inclusion, and the power of
language cannot be underestimated.
Well, a lady on the group took exception to my political posts.
This mother has a young preschooler with complex medical needs, and spends a lot of time in hospital, trying to survive. This is increadably hard for her and her entire family (the other children have to miss their mother for long spells while she is in hospital with their sick sibling). That she's not too interested in the politics of language is obvious, she has more pressing matters to deal with.
Last Thursday I send the group a report by Access Economics on how much CP costs the nation (follow the links here to view the full
media release from CP Australia ( PDF - 23 KB) or download the full report,
The Economic Impact of Cerebral Palsy in Australia in 2007 The report is a good thing. It gives us better weapons to ask for better services, funding to disability programs (like PADP) and of course, better payment for Carers. I mean, compare $306 average weekly cost to the $90.45 fortnightly Carer’s Allowance. It's an interesting report and a vital lobbying tool for parents and carers We need this sort of information. We just have to be careful that it doesn’t get mis-used. Just because they are disabled doesn’t mean my kids are costly scroungers….
So I added a note to the group that "
I’m not so happy with having our children analyzed only in terms of what they cost" and referred to a post by some of the group members on the
Carers 2020 website where they argue that it's time to change our thinking. The money spent on disabled kids (therapies, equipment, etc) is not so much a "cost" but actually an "investment" in their future. Help them out now, and one day they may be bringing home silver medals in the Paralympics, run a business, be a father, or get a job and pay their taxes.
My comment on the "cost" language came after some other posts on language, and was one too many for her. It doesn't really matter what she said. I probably should have thought "she's havign a rough time" and let it pass, but when she claimed that the whole group was unsupportive and dragging her down, I got defensive. I felt that was unfair to the group, anyone, that includes her and me, is free to post about any issue that is relevant to their situation as parents of children with CP. So I replied, and one thing let to another, and ended in some messages that were not nice (and I am equally guilty as accused). Best not said too much about it. But one of the things she wrote to me in her anger did rather upset me.
She wrote
You know, really Heike, I just think that you just don't get it. Whilst you are so worried about every label and anything that you can twist around to take offence at, there are other people in this group who are just concentrating on meeting the needs of their children so that they survive another day or week or year.
At first I was a bit offended by the "reverse competition" of "my kid is worse than yours" in the commnent. I didn't think that was very useful in a support group, and it's not really the level I want to decsend to.
But then of course, she is right.
I am very lucky that none of our kids have any medical issues to deal with. I don't have a clue what she, and others like her, have to go through. If my kid was in hospital, or having regular seizures, or whatever, I probably couldn’t give a toss about language either.
Yet.
As far as I am concerned, they are all different sides of the same coin.
There are those of us struggling very hard to keep our kids alive and in this world. There are others who are just trying to stay functional in this world. And others - with less life-threatening issues at hand - who are trying to make that same world a bit of a better place for all our kids, and all those who are "different" from the norm. And we all go through periods where different things take priority.
Language matters, for all our kids. One day, these kids will no longer be quite so medically fragile and go to school. Or the shops. Or the playground. And come home in tears over something others have said.
Language matters to me.
Where is the line between “disabled kids cost
that much” and “disabled kids cost
too much”?